IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v75y2020i7p1423-1432..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Changing Relationship Between Partnership Status and Loneliness: Effects Related to Aging and Historical Time

Author

Listed:
  • Anne BögerMSc
  • Oliver HuxholdDrPhil
  • Lynn MartirePhD

Abstract

ObjectivesPartnership status is a central predictor of loneliness. The strength of this predictive relationship, however, may decrease in the course of aging and over historical time. Moreover, there may be aging-related and historical changes in the satisfaction with partnership and singlehood.MethodLongitudinal data from the German Ageing Survey (DEAS) assessed in 2008 and 2014 (N = 6,188, age range: 40–85 years) was analyzed with multigroup structural equation models to disentangle aging-related and historical changes in the relationship of partnership status and loneliness and in the average level of satisfaction with partnership and singlehood.ResultsWith advancing age, partnership status became less predictive of loneliness and the satisfaction with being single increased. Among later-born cohorts, the association between partnership status and loneliness was less strong than among earlier-born cohorts. Later-born single people were more satisfied with being single than their earlier-born counterparts. There was no indication for an aging-related or historical decrease in partnership satisfaction.DiscussionThe relevance of partnership status as a predictor of social well-being is neither universal nor stable but appears to change in the course of aging and across historical time.

Suggested Citation

  • Anne BögerMSc & Oliver HuxholdDrPhil & Lynn MartirePhD, 2020. "The Changing Relationship Between Partnership Status and Loneliness: Effects Related to Aging and Historical Time," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 75(7), pages 1423-1432.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:75:y:2020:i:7:p:1423-1432.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gby153
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:75:y:2020:i:7:p:1423-1432.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.