IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v75y2020i7p1403-1413..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Episodic Memory in Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Pilot Study

Author

Listed:
  • Rosa ManentiPhD
  • Marco SandriniPhD
  • Elena GobbiMSc
  • Giuliano BinettiMD
  • Maria CotelliPhD
  • Nicole AndersonPhD, CPsych

Abstract

ObjectivesEpisodic memory is impaired in amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI), which is posited as a potential prodromal form of Alzheimer’s disease. Reactivated existing memories become sensitive to modification during reconsolidation. There is evidence that the lateral prefrontal cortex (PFC) plays causal role in episodic memory reconsolidation. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) applied to the PFC after a contextual reminder enhanced episodic memory performance up to 1 month, conceivably through reconsolidation, in older adults with subjective memory complaints, a condition that may represent a “pre-mild cognitive impairment” stage. The aim of this pilot study was to test the effect of PFC-tDCS (anode over left lateral PFC, cathode over right supraorbital area) after a contextual reminder on episodic memory in older adults with aMCI.MethodOlder adults with aMCI learned a list of words. Twenty-four hours later, tDCS (Active or Sham) was applied after a contextual reminder. Memory retrieval (free recall and recognition) was tested 48 hrs and 1 month after the learning session.ResultsActive tDCS enhanced recognition memory relative to Sham stimulation.DiscussionModulating reconsolidation with PFC-tDCS might be a novel intervention to enhance episodic memories in aMCI.

Suggested Citation

  • Rosa ManentiPhD & Marco SandriniPhD & Elena GobbiMSc & Giuliano BinettiMD & Maria CotelliPhD & Nicole AndersonPhD, CPsych, 2020. "Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Episodic Memory in Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Pilot Study," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 75(7), pages 1403-1413.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:75:y:2020:i:7:p:1403-1413.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gby134
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:75:y:2020:i:7:p:1403-1413.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.