IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v75y2020i6p1292-1301..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cumulative Inequality at the End of Life?: Racial Disparities in Impairment in the Time Before Death

Author

Listed:
  • Miles G Taylor
  • Stella N MinMA
  • Keshia M Reid
  • Markus Schafer

Abstract

ObjectivesDrawing from cumulative inequality (CI) theory, the current study examined racial disparities in impairment as individuals approached death to determine whether proposed mechanisms hypothesized to fuel or diminish racial disparities at late ages were at work at the end of individualized life spans.MethodBlack–white disparities were analyzed among decedents using latent growth curves based on the data from the North Carolina Established Populations for Epidemiologic Studies of the Elderly (EPESE) (N = 1,926).ResultsConsistent with previous literature, racial inequalities in functional disparities diminish at late ages. However, significant black–white disparities emerge as older adults approach death, exponentially increasing within the 2 years immediately preceding death. Further, these disparities are not fully mediated by socioeconomic status.DiscussionThe results confirm that CI in health outcomes is observable in late life among individual life spans, suggesting the years surrounding death may be a particularly vulnerable period for health inequality. Future research should examine how advantaged statuses translate to increased access to health-related resources that aid in maintaining greater functional independence until the last stage of life.

Suggested Citation

  • Miles G Taylor & Stella N MinMA & Keshia M Reid & Markus Schafer, 2020. "Cumulative Inequality at the End of Life?: Racial Disparities in Impairment in the Time Before Death," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 75(6), pages 1292-1301.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:75:y:2020:i:6:p:1292-1301.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gby129
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:75:y:2020:i:6:p:1292-1301.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.