IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v75y2020i5p991-1000..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Subjective Age and Emotion Covariation: Findings From Two Daily Experience Studies

Author

Listed:
  • Amit ShriraPhD
  • Dikla Segel-KarpasPhD
  • Ehud BodnerPhD
  • Yuval PalgiPhD
  • Shevaun D NeupertPhD

Abstract

ObjectivesThis article focuses on an aspect of emotional complexity as seen in the covariation between positive affect (PA) and negative affect (NA). Lifespan theories predict distinctive patterns of change in emotion covariation with chronological age. Nevertheless, research shows mixed evidence with most studies failing to find a significant connection between chronological age and emotion covariation. We propose to look beyond chronological age and assess the relationship between subjective age and emotion covariation. Subjective age refers to how old one perceives oneself to be, and therefore may be more pertinent to one’s emotional experience than chronological age. We further explored whether the relationship between subjective age and emotion covariation is modified by chronological age.MethodWe used data from 2 daily diary study samples (N = 188, mean age = 57.84, range = 29–100, and N = 334, mean age = 58.15, range = 30–90).ResultsMultilevel models showed that individuals who perceived themselves as older showed stronger inverse PA–NA relationship, reflecting lower emotional complexity. Chronological age (net of subjective age) and emotion covariation were unrelated in both samples. Moreover, in Study 2 there was a 3-way interaction between PA, subjective age and chronological age, suggesting that subjective age is more strongly related to emotion covariation among older adults than among younger adults.DiscussionThe relationship between subjective age and emotion covariation is discussed in light of lifespan theories.

Suggested Citation

  • Amit ShriraPhD & Dikla Segel-KarpasPhD & Ehud BodnerPhD & Yuval PalgiPhD & Shevaun D NeupertPhD, 2020. "Subjective Age and Emotion Covariation: Findings From Two Daily Experience Studies," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 75(5), pages 991-1000.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:75:y:2020:i:5:p:991-1000.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gby125
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:75:y:2020:i:5:p:991-1000.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.