IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v75y2020i5p961-969..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Age-Related Decline in Learning Deterministic Judgment-Based Sequences

Author

Listed:
  • Layla DangBA
  • Sylvia P LarsonBA
  • Mark A GluckPhD
  • Jessica R PetokPhD
  • Angela GutchessPhD

Abstract

ObjectivesBecause sequence learning is integral to cognitive functions across the life span, the present study examined the effect of healthy aging on deterministic judgment-based sequence learning.MethodsCollege-aged, younger–old (YO), and older–old (OO) adults completed a judgment-based sequence learning task which required them to learn a full sequence by chaining together single stimulus–response associations in a step-by-step fashion.ResultsResults showed that younger adults outperformed YO and OO adults; older adults were less able to acquire the full sequence and committed significantly more errors during learning. Additionally, higher sequence learning errors were associated with advancing age among older adults, even when controlling for other factors known to contribute to sequence learning abilities. Such impairments were selective to learning sequential information, because adults of all ages performed equivalently on postlearning probe trials, as well as on learning simple stimulus–response associations.DiscussionThis pattern of age deficits during deterministic sequence learning challenges past reports of age preservation. Though the neural processes underlying learning cannot be determined here, our patterns of age deficits and preservation may reflect different brain regions that are involved in the task phases, adding behavioral evidence to the emerging hypothesis of frontostriatal declines despite spared hippocampal function with age.

Suggested Citation

  • Layla DangBA & Sylvia P LarsonBA & Mark A GluckPhD & Jessica R PetokPhD & Angela GutchessPhD, 2020. "Age-Related Decline in Learning Deterministic Judgment-Based Sequences," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 75(5), pages 961-969.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:75:y:2020:i:5:p:961-969.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gby100
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:75:y:2020:i:5:p:961-969.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.