IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v75y2020i4p743-752..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Can False Memories Prime Problem Solutions for Healthy Older Adults and Those With Alzheimer’s Disease?

Author

Listed:
  • Shazia Akhtar
  • Mark L Howe
  • Kedron Hoepstine
  • Angela Gutchess

Abstract

ObjectiveRecent research has shown that false memories can have a positive consequence on human cognition in both children and young adults. The present experiment investigated whether false memories could have similar positive effects by priming solutions to insight-based problems in healthy older adults and people with Alzheimer’s disease (AD).MethodParticipants were asked to solve compound remote associate task (CRAT) problems, half of which had been preceded by the presentation of Deese/Roediger-McDermott (DRM) lists whose critical lures (CL) were also the solutions to those problems.ResultsThe results showed that regardless of cognitive ability, when the CL was falsely recognized, CRAT problems were solved more often and reliably faster than problems that were not primed by a DRM list. When the CL was not falsely recognized, CRAT problem solution rates and times were no different from when there was no DRM priming.DiscussionThese findings are consistent with predictions from theories of associative activation and demonstrate the importance of automatic spreading activation processes in memory across the life span.

Suggested Citation

  • Shazia Akhtar & Mark L Howe & Kedron Hoepstine & Angela Gutchess, 2020. "Can False Memories Prime Problem Solutions for Healthy Older Adults and Those With Alzheimer’s Disease?," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 75(4), pages 743-752.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:75:y:2020:i:4:p:743-752.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gby064
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:75:y:2020:i:4:p:743-752.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.