Author
Listed:
- Sarah Marone
- Katherine Bloore
- Paola Sebastiani
- Christopher Flynn
- Brittany Leonard
- Kelsey Whitaker
- Marilyn Mostowy
- Thomas T Perls
- Stacy L Andersen
- Shevaun Neupert
Abstract
ObjectivesPurpose in life (PIL), a feeling of meaning and direction in life, is associated with favorable health outcomes including lower mortality and reduced risk of disease, disability, and cognitive impairment. Since centenarian offspring have been shown to have long health spans we sought to examine whether they have higher PIL than individuals without familial longevity.MethodWe compared PIL scores from the Ryff Scales of Psychological Well-Being in centenarian offspring from the New England Centenarian Study (N = 361, mean age = 82.0 years) with 3 referent groups: spouses, birth cohort-matched referents, and Health and Retirement Study (HRS) participants.ResultsLogistic regression analyses adjusted for age, sex, education, and marital status indicated greater odds of high PIL among centenarian offspring compared with spouse (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.92, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.002–3.68, p = .049) and birth cohort referents (aOR = 2.64, 95% CI = 1.36–5.14, p = .004). Offspring had an almost 3 times greater odds of having high PIL than HRS participants (odds ratio [OR] = 2.93, 95% CI = 2.17–3.96, p < .0001).DiscussionHigher PIL is associated with being an offspring of a long-lived parent and may play a role in the ability to delay age-associated illnesses and functional decline. Increasing purposefulness may be a target for interventions to promote healthy aging.
Suggested Citation
Sarah Marone & Katherine Bloore & Paola Sebastiani & Christopher Flynn & Brittany Leonard & Kelsey Whitaker & Marilyn Mostowy & Thomas T Perls & Stacy L Andersen & Shevaun Neupert, 2020.
"Purpose in Life Among Centenarian Offspring,"
The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 75(2), pages 308-315.
Handle:
RePEc:oup:geronb:v:75:y:2020:i:2:p:308-315.
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:75:y:2020:i:2:p:308-315.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.