IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v75y2020i10p2075-2085..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cultural Relevance Reduces the Enhanced Neural Processing of Positively Valenced Information in Older Adults

Author

Listed:
  • Xianmin Gong
  • Helene H Fung
  • Ginger Qinghong Zeng
  • Chun-Yu Tse
  • Angela Gutchess

Abstract

ObjectivesThis study investigated (a) whether the age-related enhancement in processing positive relative to negative emotional information happened at the early and/or late processing stages and (b) if the age-related positivity effect was modulated by cultural relevance using event-related brain potential (ERP).MethodsSeventeen younger and 19 older Chinese adults judged the emotional valence of Chinese and Western pictures while electroencephalogram (EEG) was recorded and analyzed by temporospatial principal component analysis to dissociate the processing stages.Results(a) Larger N100 for negative than positive pictures was observed in younger, but not older adults, while older but not younger adults showed larger late anterior P300 for positive than negative pictures. (b) Older adults showed larger early posterior P300 for positive than negative Western pictures, but not culturally relevant Chinese pictures; such modulation effect by cultural relevance was absent in younger adults.DiscussionThese findings suggest an age-related decrease in sensitivity to negative information in the earlier stage and an age-related increase in sensitivity to positive information in the later stage of cognitive processing. This supports a dual-route model of the age-related positivity effect. Moreover, the age-related positivity effect is more evident for stimuli with less cultural relevance.

Suggested Citation

  • Xianmin Gong & Helene H Fung & Ginger Qinghong Zeng & Chun-Yu Tse & Angela Gutchess, 2020. "Cultural Relevance Reduces the Enhanced Neural Processing of Positively Valenced Information in Older Adults," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 75(10), pages 2075-2085.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:75:y:2020:i:10:p:2075-2085.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbz049
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:75:y:2020:i:10:p:2075-2085.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.