IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v74y2019i8p1317-1325..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Retrospective Attention in Short-Term Memory Has a Lasting Effect on Long-Term Memory Across Age

Author

Listed:
  • Jonathan Strunk
  • Lauren Morgan
  • Sarah Reaves
  • Paul Verhaeghen
  • Audrey Duarte
  • Angela Gutchess

Abstract

Objectives Declines in both short- and long-term memory are typical of healthy aging. Recent findings suggest that retrodictive attentional cues (“retro-cues†) that indicate the location of to-be-probed items in short-term memory (STM) have a lasting impact on long-term memory (LTM) performance in young adults. Whether older adults can also use retro-cues to facilitate both STM and LTM is unknown. MethodYoung and older adults performed a visual STM task in which spatially informative retro-cues or noninformative neutral-cues were presented during STM maintenance of real-world objects. We tested participants’ memory at both STM and LTM delays for objects that were previously cued with retrodictive or neutral-cues during STM order to measure the lasting impact of retrospective attention on LTM. Results Older adults showed reduced STM and LTM capacity compared to young adults. However, they showed similar magnitude retro-cue memory benefits as young adults at both STM and LTM delays. Discussion To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate whether retro-cues in STM facilitate the encoding of objects into LTM such that they are more likely to be subsequently retrieved by older adults. Our results support the idea that retrospective attention can be an effective means by which older adults can improve their STM and LTM performance, even in the context of reduced memory capacity.

Suggested Citation

  • Jonathan Strunk & Lauren Morgan & Sarah Reaves & Paul Verhaeghen & Audrey Duarte & Angela Gutchess, 2019. "Retrospective Attention in Short-Term Memory Has a Lasting Effect on Long-Term Memory Across Age," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 74(8), pages 1317-1325.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:74:y:2019:i:8:p:1317-1325.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gby045
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:74:y:2019:i:8:p:1317-1325.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.