IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v74y2019i7p1101-1110..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Age-by-Emotion Interactions in Memory Retrieval Processes: An Event-Related Potential Study

Author

Listed:
  • Jaclyn H Ford
  • Elizabeth A Kensinger
  • Nicole Anderson

Abstract

Objectives Although research has identified age-by-emotion interactions in memory performance and in neural recruitment during retrieval, it remains unclear which retrieval processes are affected. The temporal resolution of event-related potentials (ERPs) provides a way to examine different component processes that operate during retrieval. Methods In the present study, younger and older adults encoded neutral and emotional images paired with neutral titles. ERPs were assessed during a recognition memory task in which participants viewed neutral titles and indicated whether each had been presented during encoding. Results An age-related posterior-to-anterior shift began in a time window typically associated with recollection-related processes (500–800 ms) while an age-by-emotion interaction occurred only during a later measurement window (800–1,200 ms). Discussion These findings suggest an effect of age on mechanisms supporting retrieval of episodic content, prior to post-retrieval processing. The potential relations to different types of detail retrieval are discussed. Further, the later age-by-emotion interactions suggest that age influences the effect of emotion on post-retrieval processes, specifically.

Suggested Citation

  • Jaclyn H Ford & Elizabeth A Kensinger & Nicole Anderson, 2019. "Age-by-Emotion Interactions in Memory Retrieval Processes: An Event-Related Potential Study," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 74(7), pages 1101-1110.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:74:y:2019:i:7:p:1101-1110.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbx098
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:74:y:2019:i:7:p:1101-1110.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.