IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v74y2019i5p891-896..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Help-Seeking Among Victims of Elder Abuse: Findings From the National Elder Mistreatment Study

Author

Listed:
  • David Burnes
  • Ron Acierno
  • Melba Hernandez-TejadaDHA,

Abstract

Objectives The vast majority of elder abuse (EA) victims remain hidden from formal institutional response systems. Guided by the Behavioral Model of Health Services Use, this study examined factors that facilitate or impede formal help-seeking among victims of elder emotional abuse, physical abuse, and sexual abuse. Method sData came from a national, population-based EA study in the United States with a representative sample (n = 304) of past-year victims. Gold-standard strategies were used to assess EA subtypes. Multivariate logistic regression was conducted to identify help-seeking facilitators/barriers. Results Help-seeking through reporting to police or other authorities occurred among only 15.4% of EA victims. Help-seeking was higher among victims of physical abuse, poly-victimization, or those with a perpetrator having prior police trouble. Help-seeking was lower among victims who were dependent upon their perpetrator and in cases where the perpetrator had a large friendship network. Discussion This study highlights the hidden nature of EA as a problem in our society and the need to develop strategies that incorporate victim, perpetrator, and victim–perpetrator relationship factors to promote greater help-seeking among victims.

Suggested Citation

  • David Burnes & Ron Acierno & Melba Hernandez-TejadaDHA,, 2019. "Help-Seeking Among Victims of Elder Abuse: Findings From the National Elder Mistreatment Study," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 74(5), pages 891-896.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:74:y:2019:i:5:p:891-896.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gby122
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:74:y:2019:i:5:p:891-896.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.