IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v74y2019i5p796-805..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Age Differences in the Influence of Induced Negative Emotion on Decision-Making: The Role of Emotion Regulation

Author

Listed:
  • Xuqun You
  • Chengting Ju
  • Mo Wang
  • Baoshan Zhang
  • Pei Liu

Abstract

Objectives In this study, we hypothesized that there is an age difference in the influence of negative emotion on decision-making and that this age difference is related to emotion regulation strategies. Method We carried out two studies. In the first, the older and younger adults completed the ultimatum game (UG) while in either an induced negative emotional or a neutral context. In the second, both the older and younger adults completed the UG while in an induced negative emotion while using either emotion reappraisal or expressive suppression to regulate their emotions during the task. Results The first study showed that, unlike younger adults, the older adults made similar choices in the neutral and negative induction groups. In addition, the older adults predominantly used a reappraisal strategy in both the negative and neutral emotional states, whereas the younger adults predominantly used a suppression strategy in the negative emotional state. In the second study, after the emotion regulation strategies were experimentally manipulated so that both age groups used the same strategy, we found no age difference in decision-making. Discussion Our findings indicated that the influence of negative emotion on decision-making differs between older and younger adults and that this age difference was associated with their different emotion regulation processes.

Suggested Citation

  • Xuqun You & Chengting Ju & Mo Wang & Baoshan Zhang & Pei Liu, 2019. "Age Differences in the Influence of Induced Negative Emotion on Decision-Making: The Role of Emotion Regulation," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 74(5), pages 796-805.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:74:y:2019:i:5:p:796-805.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbx137
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:74:y:2019:i:5:p:796-805.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.