IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v74y2019i5p745-755..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reminiscence in Everyday Conversations: A Naturalistic Observation Study of Older Adults

Author

Listed:
  • Burcu Demiray
  • Marianne Mischler
  • Mike Martin

Abstract

Objectives We examined older adults’ social reminiscence behavior in everyday life, and the relation between reminiscence functions and well-being. Method The sample included 2,164 sound snippets that included speech from 45 healthy older adults. We examined reminiscence in daily conversations using the Electronically Activated Recorder. Across four days, we collected a random sample of about 280 sound files (30 seconds long) per participant. Participants’ utterances were coded for whether they included reminiscence, for their functions and conversation partners. Participants completed mood and life satisfaction measures. Results Participants reminisced in 5% of their utterances (range: 0%–29%). They reminisced in 40% of cases with friends, 32.8% with their partner and 8% with their children/relatives. Three reminiscence functions were observed: identity, teaching/informing, and conversation. Participants’ reminiscence served the identity function while they were reminiscing with their partner and children. Participants reminisced to teach/inform while reminiscing with their children and strangers. Reminiscing for conversation occurred mainly with partner and friends. We found positive relations between life satisfaction and identity, teach/inform, and conversation functions. Mood had a negative relation with identity and teach/inform functions. Discussion This is the first study to take a naturalistic observation approach to reminiscence and to build on self-report data.

Suggested Citation

  • Burcu Demiray & Marianne Mischler & Mike Martin, 2019. "Reminiscence in Everyday Conversations: A Naturalistic Observation Study of Older Adults," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 74(5), pages 745-755.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:74:y:2019:i:5:p:745-755.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbx141
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:74:y:2019:i:5:p:745-755.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.