IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v74y2019i4p642-651..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Affective Influences on Older Adults’ Attention to Self-Relevant Negative Information

Author

Listed:
  • Claire M GrowneyBS
  • Thomas M HessPhD

Abstract

ObjectivesSome research suggests that older adults have a tendency to be biased toward positive information, but may be more willing to attend to potentially beneficial negative information in certain situations. Following the mood-as-resource framework, one possibility is that older adults may be more willing to consider negative information when in a positive mood, with positive affect serving as a buffer to the adverse emotional consequences that may follow.MethodYoung (n = 62) and older (n = 65) adults completed a difficult cognitive task before completing either a positive or negative experience recall task, depending upon assigned condition. Afterwards, they rated their interest in viewing their strengths and weaknesses on the previously completed task, and then selected and viewed different types of feedback (i.e., strengths or weaknesses).ResultsOlder adults in the positive condition selected more weaknesses to view and spent more time viewing weaknesses than older adults in the negative condition. There were no differences across conditions in behavioral results for young adults. Ratings of interest in viewing different types of feedback did not correspond with actual feedback viewing behavior.DiscussionResults highlight the importance of considering older adults’ pre-existing mood before addressing self-relevant information that may be negative but important.

Suggested Citation

  • Claire M GrowneyBS & Thomas M HessPhD, 2019. "Affective Influences on Older Adults’ Attention to Self-Relevant Negative Information," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 74(4), pages 642-651.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:74:y:2019:i:4:p:642-651.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbx108
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:74:y:2019:i:4:p:642-651.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.