IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v74y2019i4p625-632..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Effect of Stereotype Threat on Age Differences in Prospective Memory Performance: Differential Effects on Focal Versus Nonfocal Tasks

Author

Listed:
  • Sascha ZuberMS
  • Andreas IhlePhD
  • Anaëlle BlumMS
  • Olivier DesrichardPhD
  • Matthias KliegelPhD

Abstract

ObjectivesThe current study examined the effects of stereotype threat on prospective memory (PM) performance in younger versus older adults by using a focal (i.e., low cognitive demands) and a nonfocal (i.e., high cognitive demands) PM task.MethodSixty younger and 60 older adults performed an event-based PM task, in which task instructions were experimentally manipulated. Half of the participants received instructions that emphasized the memory component of the task (memory condition; i.e., high stereotype threat for older adults) whereas the other half was instructed that the task evaluated participants’ reading-ability (reading condition; i.e., low stereotype threat).ResultsOlder adults’ PM performance was worse than younger adults’ only in the memory condition and these effects were specific for nonfocal PM cues as well as for old-old adults.DiscussionConceptually, this indicates that stereotype threat particularly impacts age effects for cognitive processes associated with executive control and that this particularly affects old-old adults. Therefore, the current findings illustrate for the first time that age differences in PM can be influenced by stereotype threat and suggest changes in controlled attention as possible cognitive pathway.

Suggested Citation

  • Sascha ZuberMS & Andreas IhlePhD & Anaëlle BlumMS & Olivier DesrichardPhD & Matthias KliegelPhD, 2019. "The Effect of Stereotype Threat on Age Differences in Prospective Memory Performance: Differential Effects on Focal Versus Nonfocal Tasks," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 74(4), pages 625-632.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:74:y:2019:i:4:p:625-632.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbx097
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:74:y:2019:i:4:p:625-632.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.