IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v74y2019i4p585-594..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Stereotype Threat Reduces the Positivity of Older Adults’ Recall

Author

Listed:
  • Sarah J BarberPhD
  • Jordan SeligerMA
  • Nicholas YehMA
  • Shyuan Ching TanMA

Abstract

ObjectivesAs people get older, they show a relative preference to remember positive information over negative information. In two experiments, we tested whether the positivity of older adults’ memory is affected by stereotype threat about age-related cognitive declines. We also tested whether highlighting a positive aging stereotype (older adults are wise) would inoculate older adults from stereotype threat’s adverse effects.MethodIn Experiments 1 and 2, we manipulated whether stereotypes about age-related cognitive decline were highlighted (stereotype threat) or mitigated (stereotype alleviation). In Experiment 2, we included a third condition (intervention + stereotype threat), which highlighted positive and negative aging stereotypes. Participants then saw emotionally evocative pictures and completed a memory test.ResultsIn both experiments, stereotype threat selectively reduced older adults’ memory for positive pictures but did not affect their memory for negative pictures. This eliminated the positivity effect (i.e., the Age × Valence interaction; Experiment 1). Our positive stereotype intervention did not reduce stereotype threat’s adverse effect (Experiment 2).DiscussionOur findings show that the positivity effect is more robust when testing situations minimize stereotype threat. They also suggest that health interventions designed to capitalize on the positivity effect should ensure that ageist stereotypes are mitigated in the environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Sarah J BarberPhD & Jordan SeligerMA & Nicholas YehMA & Shyuan Ching TanMA, 2019. "Stereotype Threat Reduces the Positivity of Older Adults’ Recall," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 74(4), pages 585-594.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:74:y:2019:i:4:p:585-594.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gby026
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:74:y:2019:i:4:p:585-594.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.