IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v74y2019i4p565-574..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimism for the Future in Younger and Older Adults

Author

Listed:
  • Kelly A DurbinMA
  • Sarah J BarberPhD
  • Maddalena Brown
  • Mara MatherPhD

Abstract

ObjectivesResearch has suggested that older adults are less optimistic about their future than younger adults; however, a limitation of prior studies is that younger and older adults were forecasting to different ages and stages of life. To address this, we investigated whether there are age differences in future optimism when people project to the exact same age. We also tested whether optimism differs when projecting one’s own future versus another person’s future.MethodParticipants were 285 younger and 292 older adults recruited from Amazon Mechanical Turk. Participants completed writing and word-rating tasks in which they imagined their own future in 15 years, their own future at age 85, or the average person’s future at age 85.ResultsYounger adults were more optimistic than older adults about their own future in 15 years. In contrast, both age groups were similarly optimistic about their future at age 85 and expected it to be more positive than others’ future at age 85.DiscussionContrary to previous research, younger and older adults had comparable future forecasts when projecting to the exact same age. These findings emphasize the need to consider age and stage of life when examining age differences in future optimism.

Suggested Citation

  • Kelly A DurbinMA & Sarah J BarberPhD & Maddalena Brown & Mara MatherPhD, 2019. "Optimism for the Future in Younger and Older Adults," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 74(4), pages 565-574.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:74:y:2019:i:4:p:565-574.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbx171
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. repec:cup:judgdm:v:16:y:2021:i:2:p:422-459 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. William J. Skylark & George D. Farmer & Nadia Bahemia, 2021. "Inference and preference in intertemporal choice," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 16(2), pages 422-459, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:74:y:2019:i:4:p:565-574.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.