IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v74y2019i3p440-448..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Are Older Adults More Willing to Donate? The Roles of Donation Form and Social Relationship

Author

Listed:
  • Xianmin GongPhD
  • Fan ZhangPhD
  • Helene H FungPhD

Abstract

ObjectivesWhether older adults are more prosocial than younger adults has been under debate. In the current study, we investigated how age differences in prosocial behaviors varied across different contextual factors, that is, donation form, kinship, and social distance.MethodsTo achieve this purpose, 89 younger and 66 older adults took part in a hypothetical donation task in which they were asked to donate money and time to relatives and nonrelatives at various social distances.ResultsThe results showed that, compared to younger adults, (a) older adults donated less to nonrelatives (regardless of the donation form), but donated a similar amount (in money) or even donated more (in time) to relatives; (b) older adults displayed higher levels of kin selection (favoring relatives over nonrelatives) in both monetary and time donations; and (c) older adults showed higher levels of social discounting (favoring socially close over distant others) in monetary but not time donation.DiscussionThe study underscored the importance of contextual factors in understanding age differences in prosocial behaviors such as donation.

Suggested Citation

  • Xianmin GongPhD & Fan ZhangPhD & Helene H FungPhD, 2019. "Are Older Adults More Willing to Donate? The Roles of Donation Form and Social Relationship," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 74(3), pages 440-448.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:74:y:2019:i:3:p:440-448.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbx099
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:74:y:2019:i:3:p:440-448.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.