IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v74y2019i2p364-372..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measuring Successful Aging With Respect for Preferences of Older Persons

Author

Listed:
  • Koen Decancq
  • Alexander Michiels

Abstract

Objectives This paper explores how to measure successful aging in a manner consistent with the preferences of older persons about what matters in their lives. Method To overcome the fact that existing objective and subjective measures of successful aging may not reflect the preferences of older persons about what matters in their lives, a new preference-based measure of successful aging is proposed. To implement the measure, the preferences of older persons are estimated using a statistical life satisfaction model, which is estimated with data from 11 European countries from the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE). Results The proposed measure is found to yield different results compared to objective and subjective measures in terms of how successful aging has evolved between 2007 and 2013 and how countries are ranked for successful aging. Successful aging measured by a subjective measure is highest in 2011 compared to 2007 and 2013, for instance, whereas the ranking is reversed for the objective- and preference-based measures. Discussion The findings highlight the relevance of the degree of importance we attribute to the preferences of older persons in the measurement of successful aging, methodologically as well as empirically.

Suggested Citation

  • Koen Decancq & Alexander Michiels, 2019. "Measuring Successful Aging With Respect for Preferences of Older Persons," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 74(2), pages 364-372.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:74:y:2019:i:2:p:364-372.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbx060
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or search for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:74:y:2019:i:2:p:364-372.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.