IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v74y2019i2p275-283..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Effects of Age and Hearing Loss on Dual-Task Balance and Listening

Author

Listed:
  • Halina Bruce
  • Daniel Aponte
  • Nancy St-Onge
  • Natalie Phillips
  • Jean-Pierre Gagné
  • Karen Z H Li

Abstract

Objectives Among older adults (OA), hearing loss is associated with an increased risk for falls. The aim of the present study was to experimentally investigate the cognitive compensation hypothesis, wherein decreased auditory and motor functioning are compensated by the recruitment of cognitive resources. Method Twenty-nine younger adults (YA), 26 OA, and 32 OA with age-related hearing loss (ARHL) completed a dual-task paradigm consisting of cognitive and balance recovery tasks performed singly and concurrently. The auditory stimuli were presented with or without background noise. Results Both older adult groups performed significantly worse than YA on the cognitive task in noisy conditions and ARHL also demonstrated disproportionate negative effects of dual-tasking and noise. The kinematic data indicated that OA and ARHL demonstrated greater plantarflexion when compared with YA. Conversely, YA showed greater hip extension in response to dual-tasking. Discussion The cognitive and balance results suggest that YA were able to flexibly allocate their attention between tasks, whereas ARHL exhibited prioritization of posture over cognitive performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Halina Bruce & Daniel Aponte & Nancy St-Onge & Natalie Phillips & Jean-Pierre Gagné & Karen Z H Li, 2019. "The Effects of Age and Hearing Loss on Dual-Task Balance and Listening," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 74(2), pages 275-283.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:74:y:2019:i:2:p:275-283.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbx047
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:74:y:2019:i:2:p:275-283.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.