IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v74y2019i1p82-86..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Can’t Read my Broker Face: Learning About Trustworthiness With Age

Author

Listed:
  • Eileen C Rasmussen
  • Angela Gutchess

Abstract

Objectives We assessed how age impacted learning who to trust, and the extent to which this type of learning relied on explicit memory. In contrast to prior studies, target faces were neutral without prior reputational information. MethodYounger (YA) and older adults (OA) made investment decisions for 36 brokers, who yielded a good, neutral, or bad outcome. Brokers were encountered three times to measure adaptive learning. After the investment task, participants completed a surprise explicit source memory test for brokers. Results Although YA and OA learned to distinguish good and bad brokers from neutral ones, OA did not learn the brokers’ behavior as well as younger adults. In addition, explicit source memory was highly correlated with investment decisions, although less so for good brokers for older than younger adults. Discussion Findings extend prior work by establishing that OA impairments in learning who to trust extend to neutral faces, and highlighting the role of explicit memory in investment performance. Future work should vary the task demands to explore the contribution of explicit and implicit processes.

Suggested Citation

  • Eileen C Rasmussen & Angela Gutchess, 2019. "Can’t Read my Broker Face: Learning About Trustworthiness With Age," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 74(1), pages 82-86.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:74:y:2019:i:1:p:82-86.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gby012
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Learning; Memory; Trust;
    All these keywords.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:74:y:2019:i:1:p:82-86.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.