IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v74y2019i1p69-73..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Which Factors do Older Adults Consider When Estimating the Time Left for Them to Live?

Author

Listed:
  • Yuval Palgi
  • Amit Shrira
  • Gitit Kavé
  • Tom Rubinstein
  • Dov Shmotkin

Abstract

Objectives The present study examines which factors older adults consider as important when rating their subjective nearness-to-death (SNtD), as well as the associations between corresponding variables as reported in a multidimensional questionnaire and responses on a SNtD question. In addition, we examine whether importance ratings fit or diverge from the actual associations between corresponding variables and SNtD. MethodTwo hundred and seventy-two participants (average age 80.75) reported their health and functioning, their SNtD, and the importance of each of 13 preselected factors in evaluating SNtD. Results Respondents considered physical functioning and psychological factors as the most important factors to their SNtD evaluation, and genetic factors (i.e., age, gender, parental longevity) as the least important. Ratings of importance were strongly and positively correlated with the strength of the associations between the corresponding variables and SNtD. Discussion Older adults appear to have implicit knowledge of the factors that affect their SNtD. Yet, this knowledge is sometimes biased and does not necessarily represent variables that have been identified as related to actual longevity.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuval Palgi & Amit Shrira & Gitit Kavé & Tom Rubinstein & Dov Shmotkin, 2019. "Which Factors do Older Adults Consider When Estimating the Time Left for Them to Live?," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 74(1), pages 69-73.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:74:y:2019:i:1:p:69-73.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gby048
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:74:y:2019:i:1:p:69-73.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.