IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v73y2018i6p985-995..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Activity Diversity and Its Associations With Psychological Well-Being Across Adulthood

Author

Listed:
  • Soomi Lee
  • Rachel E Koffer
  • Briana N Sprague
  • Susan T Charles
  • Nilam Ram
  • David M Almeida

Abstract

Objectives This study examined age-related cross-sectional and longitudinal associations between activity diversity and four dimensions of well-being: psychological well-being, depression, positive affect, and negative affect.MethodActivity diversity was defined as the breadth and evenness of participation in seven daily activities including paid work, time with children, doing chores, leisure, physical activities, formal volunteering, and giving informal help to others. Participants from the National Survey of Daily Experiences (N = 793, Mage = 46.71, SDag = 12.48) provided data during two 8-day measurement bursts approximately 10 years apart.ResultsOlder adults (age = 60–74 years) who engaged in more diverse activities reported higher psychological well-being than older adults who engaged in less diverse activities; an association not significant among middle-aged adults (age = 35–59 years), and in the opposite direction for younger individuals (age = 24–34 years). Longitudinally, increased activity diversity over 10 years was marginally associated with increases in positive affect. Compared with younger individuals who increased activity diversity, older adults who increased activity diversity reported smaller decreases in psychological well-being, greater increases in positive affect, and greater decreases in negative affect.DiscussionOur findings suggest that activity diversity may play an important role in older adults’ concurrent well-being and also in their long-term longitudinal improvements of well-being.

Suggested Citation

  • Soomi Lee & Rachel E Koffer & Briana N Sprague & Susan T Charles & Nilam Ram & David M Almeida, 2018. "Activity Diversity and Its Associations With Psychological Well-Being Across Adulthood," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 73(6), pages 985-995.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:73:y:2018:i:6:p:985-995.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbw118
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Smith, Claire E. & Lee, Soomi, 2022. "Identifying diverse forms of (un)healthy sleep: Sleep profiles differentiate adults' psychological and physical well-being," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
    2. Hui Foh Foong & Sook Yee Lim & Roshanim Koris & Sharifah Azizah Haron, 2021. "Time-Use and Mental Health in Older Adults: A Scoping Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-21, April.
    3. Michael Mutz & Anne K. Reimers & Yolanda Demetriou, 2021. "Leisure Time Sports Activities and Life Satisfaction: Deeper Insights Based on a Representative Survey from Germany," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 16(5), pages 2155-2171, October.
    4. Junta Takahashi & Hisashi Kawai & Hiroyuki Suzuki & Yoshinori Fujiwara & Yutaka Watanabe & Hirohiko Hirano & Hunkyung Kim & Kazushige Ihara & Kaori Ishii & Koichiro Oka & Shuichi Obuchi, 2020. "Reliability and Validity of the Activity Diversity Questionnaire for Older Adults in Japan," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-9, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:73:y:2018:i:6:p:985-995.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.