IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v73y2018i6p1066-1076..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Family Support and Preparation for Future Care Needs Among Urban Chinese Baby Boomers

Author

Listed:
  • Yajun Song
  • Silvia Sörensen
  • Elsie C W Yan

Abstract

Objectives Little is reported about the family’s role in preparation for future care (PFC) before the onset of care needs. The primary aim was to examine the relationships between PFC and different types of family support exchanged with generations both above and below.MethodPath analysis was conducted on 516 Chinese baby boomers aged 45–65 to examine the associations between PFC (care expectation, awareness, information gathering, and decision making) and 4 types of family support (instrumental support, financial assistance, information and appraisal, and emotional support) when the covariates were controlled for.ResultsThe current planning status and planning paths are consistent with those of the U.S. and European populations. Providing instrumental support to a parent was positively associated with awareness of care needs. Providing emotional support to a child was negatively associated with information gathering. In general, receiving support from a child facilitated PFC. Although those receiving emotional support from an adult child had less awareness of care needs, they displayed more information gathering.DiscussionThe role of family support in PFC is more subtle than simply increasing and decreasing resource volumes. Future research is needed to better understand this complexity.

Suggested Citation

  • Yajun Song & Silvia Sörensen & Elsie C W Yan, 2018. "Family Support and Preparation for Future Care Needs Among Urban Chinese Baby Boomers," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 73(6), pages 1066-1076.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:73:y:2018:i:6:p:1066-1076.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbw062
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:73:y:2018:i:6:p:1066-1076.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.