IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v73y2018i4p584-593..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Adult Age Differences in Eye Movements During Reading: The Evidence From Chinese

Author

Listed:
  • Jingxin Wang
  • Lin Li
  • Sha Li
  • Fang Xie
  • Min Chang
  • Kevin B Paterson
  • Sarah J White
  • Victoria A McGowan

Abstract

ObjectivesSubstantial evidence indicates that older readers of alphabetic languages (e.g., English and German) compensate for age-related reading difficulty by employing a more risky reading strategy in which words are skipped more frequently. The effects of healthy aging on reading behavior for nonalphabetic languages, like Chinese, are largely unknown, although this would reveal the extent to which age-related changes in reading strategy are universal. Accordingly, the present research used measures of eye movements to investigate adult age differences in Chinese reading.MethodThe eye movements of young (18–30 years) and older (60+ years) Chinese readers were recorded.ResultsThe older adults exhibited typical patterns of age-related reading difficulty. But rather than employing a more risky reading strategy compared with the younger readers, the older adults read more carefully by skipping words infrequently, making shorter forward eye movements, and fixating closer to the beginnings of two-character target words in sentences.DiscussionIn contrast with the findings for alphabetic languages, older Chinese readers appear to compensate for age-related reading difficulty by employing a more careful reading strategy. Age-related changes in reading strategy therefore appear to be language specific, rather than universal, and may reflect the specific visual and linguistic requirements of the writing system.

Suggested Citation

  • Jingxin Wang & Lin Li & Sha Li & Fang Xie & Min Chang & Kevin B Paterson & Sarah J White & Victoria A McGowan, 2018. "Adult Age Differences in Eye Movements During Reading: The Evidence From Chinese," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 73(4), pages 584-593.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:73:y:2018:i:4:p:584-593.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbw036
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:73:y:2018:i:4:p:584-593.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.