IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v73y2018i4p555-563..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Last Word: A Comparison of Younger and Older Adults’ Brain Responses to Reminders of Death

Author

Listed:
  • John R Bluntschli
  • Molly Maxfield
  • Robin L Grasso
  • Michael A Kisley

Abstract

ObjectivesTerror management theory (TMT) suggests increased death awareness motivates various human behaviors and defenses. Recent research reveals age differences in response to increased awareness of death, and older adults’ proximity to death may contribute to these differences. In the first known investigation of attention’s role in these age differences, we examined brain response associated with attention allocation for death-related stimuli.MethodYounger (ages 18–28) and older (ages 61–78) adults viewed emotionally neutral, death-related negative, general negative, and positive words while recording event-related potentials (ERPs).ResultsYounger adults exhibited greater amplitudes in the late positive potential component of the ERP in response to death-related than negative words, whereas older adults showed the opposite pattern.DiscussionFindings provide neurophysiological support for the shift in older adults’ responses to death-related stimuli found in other TMT research as well as studies reporting reduced explicit death anxiety in older adults. Results also highlight the importance of considering stimuli content in studies of attention and emotion.

Suggested Citation

  • John R Bluntschli & Molly Maxfield & Robin L Grasso & Michael A Kisley, 2018. "The Last Word: A Comparison of Younger and Older Adults’ Brain Responses to Reminders of Death," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 73(4), pages 555-563.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:73:y:2018:i:4:p:555-563.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbv115
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anna E. Kornadt & Eva-Marie Kessler & Susanne Wurm & Catherine E. Bowen & Martina Gabrian & Verena Klusmann, 2020. "Views on ageing: a lifespan perspective," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 387-401, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:73:y:2018:i:4:p:555-563.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.