IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v73y2018i3p532-542..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Social Inequality and Visual Impairment in Older People

Author

Listed:
  • Jennifer Whillans
  • James Nazroo

Abstract

ObjectivesVisual impairment is the leading cause of age-related disability, but the social patterning of loss of vision in older people has received little attention. This study’s objective was to assess the association between social position and onset of visual impairment, to empirically evidence health inequalities in later life.MethodVisual impairment was measured in 2 ways: self-reporting fair vision or worse (moderate) and self-reporting poor vision or blindness (severe). Correspondingly, 2 samples were drawn from the English Longitudinal Study on Ageing (ELSA). First, 7,483 respondents who had good vision or better at Wave 1; second, 8,487 respondents who had fair vision or better at Wave 1. Survival techniques were used.ResultsCox proportional hazards models showed wealth and subjective social status (SSS) were significant risk factors associated with the onset of visual impairment. The risk of onset of moderate visual impairment was significantly higher for the lowest and second lowest wealth quintiles, whereas the risk of onset of severe visual impairment was significantly higher for the lowest, second, and even middle wealth quintiles, compared with the highest wealth quintile. Independently, lower SSS was associated with increased risk of onset of visual impairment (both measures), particularly so for those placing themselves on the lowest rungs of the social ladder.DiscussionThe high costs of visual impairment are disproportionately felt by the worst off elderly. Both low wealth and low SSS significantly increase the risk of onset of visual impairment.

Suggested Citation

  • Jennifer Whillans & James Nazroo, 2018. "Social Inequality and Visual Impairment in Older People," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 73(3), pages 532-542.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:73:y:2018:i:3:p:532-542.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbv163
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:73:y:2018:i:3:p:532-542.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.