IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v73y2018i3p372-381..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is an Empty Nest Best?: Coresidence With Adult Children and Parental Marital Quality Before and After the Great Recession

Author

Listed:
  • Eden M Davis
  • Kyungmin Kim
  • Karen L Fingerman

Abstract

ObjectivesSince the Great Recession, the proportion of young adults living with their parents has risen steadily in the United States. Research on coresidence with adult children and parental marital quality is mixed, but marital quality may suffer if children coreside under certain circumstances. When coresidence signifies a deviation from normative expectations, it may be a source of stress in parents’ marriages. Further, living with adult children who are suffering problems may be especially detrimental to parental marital quality.MethodMiddle-aged parents (N = 287; mean age = 50.65) completed measures of marital quality, child problems, and coresidence at 2 time points, at the onset of the Great Recession in 2008 and again in 2013.ResultsRegression analyses estimating marital quality from coresidence status revealed that coresidence with a child was associated with lower parental marital quality in 2008, but not in 2013 (when it may be considered more normative to have adult children living in the home). Additional analyses showed living with a child who was suffering problems was associated with lower marital quality in 2013.DiscussionThese findings suggest that coresidence may be detrimental to marital quality, but perhaps only when coresidence is nonnormative or when coresidence co-occurs with child problems.

Suggested Citation

  • Eden M Davis & Kyungmin Kim & Karen L Fingerman, 2018. "Is an Empty Nest Best?: Coresidence With Adult Children and Parental Marital Quality Before and After the Great Recession," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 73(3), pages 372-381.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:73:y:2018:i:3:p:372-381.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbw022
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:73:y:2018:i:3:p:372-381.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.