IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v73y2018i2p248-257..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Healthy Aging Among Older Black and White Men: What Is the Role of Mastery?

Author

Listed:
  • Kenzie Latham-Mintus PhD
  • Ashley VowelsBA
  • Kyle HuskinsBA

Abstract

ObjectivesThis research explores black–white differences in healthy aging and investigates whether mastery acts as a buffer against poor health for older black and white men.MethodsUsing data from the Health and Retirement Study (HRS) (2008–2012), a series of binary logit models were created to assess healthy aging over a 2-year period. Healthy aging was defined as good subjective health and free of disability at both waves. Mastery was lagged, and analyses (n = 4,892) controlled for social and health factors.ResultsBlack–white disparities in healthy aging were observed, where older black men had lower odds of healthy aging. Mastery was associated with higher odds of healthy aging, and race moderated the relationship between mastery and healthy aging. The predicted probability of healthy aging was relatively flat across all levels of mastery among black men, yet white men saw consistent gains in the probability of healthy aging with higher levels of mastery. In race-stratified models, mastery was not a significant predictor of healthy aging among black men.DiscussionHigh levels of mastery are linked to positive health—often acting as a buffer against stressful life events. However, among older black men, higher levels of mastery did not necessarily equate to healthy aging.

Suggested Citation

  • Kenzie Latham-Mintus PhD & Ashley VowelsBA & Kyle HuskinsBA, 2018. "Healthy Aging Among Older Black and White Men: What Is the Role of Mastery?," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 73(2), pages 248-257.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:73:y:2018:i:2:p:248-257.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbx105
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:73:y:2018:i:2:p:248-257.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.