IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v73y2018i1p30-39..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Couples’ Sleep and Psychological Distress: A Dyadic Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Jen-Hao Chen

Abstract

Objectives: Research on aging has increasingly recognized sleep as a key determinant of physical and psychological well-being. The existing literature, however, considers sleep solely at the individual-level. This study constructed dyadic sleep measures and demonstrated their capacity to predict individual-level sleep and psychological distress. Methods: This study analyzed 2 waves (2009 and 2013) of older couples’ same-day time diary data from the Panel Study of Income Dynamics’ Supplement on Disability and Use of Time. Dyadic sleep measures included: (a) bedtime differences, (b) wake-up time differences, (c) a categorical indicator of couple’s sleeping routines, and (d) a categorical indicator of couple’s waking routines. Results: The measures indicated substantial discordance in the sleep habits of older couples. Results: from multilevel regressions showed that waking patterns predicted individual-level sleep durations. Dyadic sleep measures, particularly sleeping patterns, independently predicted the respondents’ psychological distress; controlling for sociodemographic characteristics, marital quality, and individual-level sleep measures. Patterns were more pronounced in the weekend measures. Discussion: Sleep is a dyadic interpersonal process. This study demonstrated that dyadic sleep is a key aspect for older adults’ sleep that cannot be reduced to individual-level sleep. Future studies and surveys should incorporate instruments to measure sleep at the couple-level.

Suggested Citation

  • Jen-Hao Chen, 2018. "Couples’ Sleep and Psychological Distress: A Dyadic Perspective," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 73(1), pages 30-39.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:73:y:2018:i:1:p:30-39.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbx001
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:73:y:2018:i:1:p:30-39.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.