IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v72y2017i6p947-955..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exportation and Validation of Latent Constructs for Dementia Case Finding in a Mexican American Population–based Cohort

Author

Listed:
  • Donald R Royall
  • Raymond F Palmer
  • Kyriakos S Markides

Abstract

BackgroundThe latent variable “δ” has been validated as a dementia phenotype. δ can be extracted from Spearman’s general intelligence factor “g” in any data set that contains measures of cognition and instrumental activities of daily living (IADL). We used δ composites (“d-scores”) to estimate the prevalence of dementia in the Hispanic Established Population for Epidemiological Studies in the Elderly (H-EPESE).Methodδ was constructed from Mini-Mental State Examination, a clock-drawing task (CLOX), and IADL. δ’s H-EPESE factor weights were validated in the well-characterized Texas Alzheimer’s Research and Care Consortium (TARCC). Optimal thresholds for the discrimination between “Alzheimer’s disease” (AD) versus normal controls (NCs) were determined by receiver operating characteristic curve. Those thresholds were used to estimate the prevalence of dementia in H-EPESE. Results: Each δ homolog fits its source’s data well. d-scores were strongly associated with Clinical Dementia Rating scale Sum of Boxes (r = .74–.85, all p < .001], and accurately distinguished AD cases from NCs, in both Mexican Americans (MAs) and non-Hispanic Whites (NHWs) [c = 0.94–0.96]. The TARCC MA threshold estimated the prevalence of dementia at 21.4% in H-EPESE. The NHW threshold estimated the prevalence of dementia at 21.0%.Conclusions: It is possible to export δ composites from populations to well-characterized cohorts for validation.

Suggested Citation

  • Donald R Royall & Raymond F Palmer & Kyriakos S Markides, 2017. "Exportation and Validation of Latent Constructs for Dementia Case Finding in a Mexican American Population–based Cohort," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 72(6), pages 947-955.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:72:y:2017:i:6:p:947-955.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbw004
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:72:y:2017:i:6:p:947-955.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.