IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v72y2017i6p1054-1066..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Role of Perceived Maternal Favoritism and Disfavoritism in Adult Children’s Psychological Well-Being

Author

Listed:
  • J Jill Suitor
  • Megan Gilligan
  • Siyun Peng
  • Jong Hyun Jung
  • Karl Pillemer

Abstract

Objectives: The detrimental consequences of parents’ differential treatment on children’s well-being have been documented in earlier stages of the life course; however, little is known about this pattern in midlife. Drawing from theories of equity and social comparison, we tested whether psychological well-being was affected only by adult children’s perceptions that their mothers treated some offspring in the family differently or by their perceptions that they were favored or disfavored. Further, we explored the extent to which these patterns differed by race. Method: Multilevel regression modeling was conducted using data collected from 725 adult children nested within 309 later-life families as part of the Within-Family Differences Study-II. Results: Depressive symptoms were higher when offspring perceived that they had the most emotional closeness to mothers or the greatest conflict with mothers. Depressive symptoms were also higher when respondents identified themselves as being the children in whom the mothers were most disappointed. Discussion: The findings shed new light on the role of intergenerational relations in adult children’s well-being in midlife by taking into consideration the respondents’ direct reports of their perceptions of their mothers’ favoritism and disfavoritism. Further, the findings provide evidence that the association between maternal differentiation and psychological well-being in adulthood is stronger in Black than in White families. These patterns suggest that the association between psychological well-being and both favoritism and disfavoritism can be accounted for by processes involving social comparison rather than equity for both Black and White adult children in midlife.

Suggested Citation

  • J Jill Suitor & Megan Gilligan & Siyun Peng & Jong Hyun Jung & Karl Pillemer, 2017. "Role of Perceived Maternal Favoritism and Disfavoritism in Adult Children’s Psychological Well-Being," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 72(6), pages 1054-1066.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:72:y:2017:i:6:p:1054-1066.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbv089
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Adam Davey & Corinna Jenkins Tucker & Karen Fingerman & Jyoti Savla, 2009. "Within-Family Variability in Representations of Past Relationships With Parents," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 64(1), pages 125-136.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:72:y:2017:i:6:p:1054-1066.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.