IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v72y2017i6p1006-1016..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Which Aspects of Social Support Are Associated With Which Cognitive Abilities for Which People?

Author

Listed:
  • Claire G La Fleur
  • Timothy A Salthouse

Abstract

Objectives: To assess the relations between 11 aspects of social support and five cognitive abilities (vocabulary, reasoning, spatial visualization, memory, and speed of processing) and to determine whether these relations between social support and cognition are moderated by age or sex. Method: A sample of 2,613 individuals between the ages of 18 and 99 years completed a battery of cognitive tests and a questionnaire assessing aspects of social support. A measure of general intelligence was computed using principal components analysis. Multiple regressions were used to evaluate whether each aspect of support and/or its interactions with age or sex predicted each cognitive ability and g. Results: Several aspects of social support were significantly related to all five cognitive abilities and to g. When g was included as a predictor, there were few relations with specific cognitive abilities. Age and sex did not moderate any of the relations. Discussion: These results suggest that contact with family and friends, emotional and informational support, anticipated support, and negative interactions are related to cognition, whereas satisfaction with and tangible support were not. In addition, these aspects of support were primarily related to g, with the exception of family contact. Social support– cognition relations are comparable across the life span and the sexes.

Suggested Citation

  • Claire G La Fleur & Timothy A Salthouse, 2017. "Which Aspects of Social Support Are Associated With Which Cognitive Abilities for Which People?," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 72(6), pages 1006-1016.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:72:y:2017:i:6:p:1006-1016.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbv119
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kira S. Birditt & Lisa M. H. Jackey & Toni C. Antonucci, 2009. "Longitudinal Patterns of Negative Relationship Quality Across Adulthood," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 64(1), pages 55-64.
    2. Tiffany F. Hughes & Ross Andel & Brent J. Small & Amy R. Borenstein & James A. Mortimer, 2008. "The Association Between Social Resources and Cognitive Change in Older Adults: Evidence From the Charlotte County Healthy Aging Study," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 63(4), pages 241-244.
    3. Ronald E. Holtzman & George W. Rebok & Jane S. Saczynski & Anthony C. Kouzis & Kathryn Wilcox Doyle & William W. Eaton, 2004. "Social Network Characteristics and Cognition in Middle-Aged and Older Adults," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 59(6), pages 278-284.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ellwardt, Lea & Van Tilburg, Theo G. & Aartsen, Marja J., 2015. "The mix matters: Complex personal networks relate to higher cognitive functioning in old age," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 107-115.
    2. Haslam, Catherine & Cruwys, Tegan & Haslam, S. Alexander, 2014. "“The we's have it”: Evidence for the distinctive benefits of group engagement in enhancing cognitive health in aging," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 57-66.
    3. Magron, Camille & Merli, Maxime, 2015. "Repurchase behavior of individual investors, sophistication and regret," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 15-26.
    4. Ellwardt, Lea & Aartsen, Marja & Deeg, Dorly & Steverink, Nardi, 2013. "Does loneliness mediate the relation between social support and cognitive functioning in later life?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 116-124.
    5. Teresa Lee & Darren M. Lipnicki & John D. Crawford & Julie D. Henry & Julian N. Trollor & David Ames & Margaret J. Wright & Perminder S. Sachdev & OATS Research Team, 2014. "Leisure Activity, Health, and Medical Correlates of Neurocognitive Performance Among Monozygotic Twins: The Older Australian Twins Study," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 69(4), pages 514-522.
    6. Risa Takashima & Ryuta Onishi & Kazuko Saeki & Michiyo Hirano, 2020. "The values and meanings of social activities for older urban men after retirement," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(11), pages 1-21, November.
    7. Jongnam Hwang & Sangmin Park & Sujin Kim, 2018. "Effects of Participation in Social Activities on Cognitive Function Among Middle-Aged and Older Adults in Korea," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-12, October.
    8. Xinyu Liu & Shuangshuang Wang & Siqi Liu & Nengliang Yao & Quan Wang & Xiaojie Sun, 2022. "The Mediating Effect of Functional Health on the Relationship between Social Capital and Cognition among Chinese Older Adults," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-14, December.
    9. Cahit Guven & Wang Sheng Lee, 2013. "Height And Cognitive Function At Older Ages: Is Height A Useful Summary Measure Of Early Childhood Experiences?," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 22(2), pages 224-233, February.
    10. Francesca Gallè & Elita Anna Sabella & Lavinia Bianco & Mario Maninchedda & Benedetta Barchielli & Fabrizio Liguori & Giovanna Da Molin & Giorgio Liguori & Giovanni Battista Orsi & Stefano Ferracuti &, 2022. "How the COVID-19 Pandemic Has Impacted Daily Life? Assessing the Use of Web Resources for Recreational Activities in the Italian Adult Population," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-13, November.
    11. Taiji Noguchi & Ippei Nojima & Tomoe Inoue-Hirakawa & Hideshi Sugiura, 2019. "The Association between Social Support Sources and Cognitive Function among Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A One-Year Prospective Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-9, October.
    12. Fan, Zili & Lv, Xiaozhen & Tu, Lihui & Zhang, Ming & Yu, Xin & Wang, Huali, 2021. "Reduced social activities and networks, but not social support, are associated with cognitive decline among older chinese adults: A prospective study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 289(C).
    13. Thomas, Patricia A., 2011. "Gender, social engagement, and limitations in late life," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 73(9), pages 1428-1435.
    14. Murayama, Hiroshi & Nishi, Mariko & Matsuo, Eri & Nofuji, Yu & Shimizu, Yumiko & Taniguchi, Yu & Fujiwara, Yoshinori & Shinkai, Shoji, 2013. "Do bonding and bridging social capital affect self-rated health, depressive mood and cognitive decline in older Japanese? A prospective cohort study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 247-252.
    15. Lee, Yeonjin & Jean Yeung, Wei-Jun, 2019. "Gender matters: Productive social engagement and the subsequent cognitive changes among older adults," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 229(C), pages 87-95.
    16. Shu Cai, 2022. "Does social participation improve cognitive abilities of the elderly?," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 35(2), pages 591-619, April.
    17. Sangmi Park & Tae-Hui Kim & Tae-Rim Eom, 2021. "Impact of Social Network Size and Contact Frequency on Resilience in Community-Dwelling Healthy Older Adults Living Alone in the Republic of Korea," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-12, June.
    18. Chiyoe Murata & Tami Saito & Masashige Saito & Katsunori Kondo, 2019. "The Association between Social Support and Incident Dementia: A 10-Year Follow-Up Study in Japan," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-10, January.
    19. Shiming Liao & Ling Qi & Jie Xiong & Jie Yan & Ruoxi Wang, 2020. "Intergenerational Ties in Context: Association between Caring for Grandchildren and Cognitive Function in Middle-Aged and Older Chinese," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(1), pages 1-18, December.
    20. Catherin Bosle & Hermann Brenner & Joachim E. Fischer & Marc N. Jarczok & Ben Schöttker & Laura Perna & Kristina Hoffmann & Raphael M. Herr, 2022. "The association between supportive social ties and autonomic nervous system function—differences between family ties and friendship ties in a cohort of older adults," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 263-276, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:72:y:2017:i:6:p:1006-1016.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.