IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v72y2017i5p876-887..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using a Smartphone-Based Ecological Momentary Assessment Protocol With Community Dwelling Older African Americans

Author

Listed:
  • Heather Fritz
  • Wassim Tarraf
  • Dan J Saleh
  • Malcolm P Cutchin

Abstract

ObjectivesLittle is known about the feasibility of smartphone-based Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) approaches to collect psychosocial data from older populations, especially disadvantaged older populations. In response to this gap, this report provides evidence of the feasibility and utility of a smartphone-based EMA approach for real-time assessment with older African Americans. In addition, we share lessons learned about how to improve utility.MethodsNinety-seven older African Americans ages 55 and older (range: 55–95 years) used an Android smartphone loaded with an EMA application to provide data about their everyday activities and stress four times per day for seven consecutive days.ResultsExit interviews early in the study suggested enhancements to the EMA interface. Adherence was demonstrated with response completion rates of 92–98% on EMA measures and no participant attrition based on the EMA protocol.DiscussionOur findings suggest using a smartphone-based EMA approach for data collection is feasible and has utility with older African Americans. We most likely enhanced adherence by testing, training, monitoring, and adapting the EMA protocol using input from older adults early in the EMA design process.

Suggested Citation

  • Heather Fritz & Wassim Tarraf & Dan J Saleh & Malcolm P Cutchin, 2017. "Using a Smartphone-Based Ecological Momentary Assessment Protocol With Community Dwelling Older African Americans," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 72(5), pages 876-887.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:72:y:2017:i:5:p:876-887.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbw166
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:72:y:2017:i:5:p:876-887.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.