IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v72y2017i3p457-467..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding Sexual Freedom and Autonomy in Assisted Living: Discourse of Residents’ Rights Among Staff and Administrators

Author

Listed:
  • Christina Barmon
  • Elisabeth O. Burgess
  • Alexis A. Bender
  • James R. MoorheadJr.

Abstract

Objectives:In contrast to nursing homes, assisted living (AL) facilities emphasize independence and autonomy as part of their mission. However, we do not know to what extent this extends to sexual freedom and autonomy.Method:Using grounded theory methodology and symbolic interactionism, we examine how staff and administrators in AL facilities discuss residents’ rights to sexual freedom and how this influences the environment of AL.Results:Staff and administrators engage in a contradictory discourse of residents’ rights that simultaneously affirms the philosophy of AL while behaving in ways that create an environment of surveillance and undermine those rights.Discussion:A discourse of residents’ rights masks a significant conflict between autonomy and protection in regards to sexual freedom in AL.

Suggested Citation

  • Christina Barmon & Elisabeth O. Burgess & Alexis A. Bender & James R. MoorheadJr., 2017. "Understanding Sexual Freedom and Autonomy in Assisted Living: Discourse of Residents’ Rights Among Staff and Administrators," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 72(3), pages 457-467.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:72:y:2017:i:3:p:457-467.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbw068
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jayne Elias & Assumpta Ryan, 2011. "A review and commentary on the factors that influence expressions of sexuality by older people in care homes," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(11‐12), pages 1668-1676, June.
    2. Paula C. Carder & Mauro Hernandez, 2004. "Consumer Discourse in Assisted Living," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 59(2), pages 58-67.
    3. Amelia Karraker & John DeLamater & Christine R. Schwartz, 2011. "Sexual Frequency Decline From Midlife to Later Life," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 66(4), pages 502-512.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Julia Alamillo, "undated". "Family Structure and Reproduction of Inequality: A Decomposition Approach," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 848d4b9e0bd14c8191ed1277b, Mathematica Policy Research.
    2. Feliciano Villar & Rodrigo Serrat & Montserrat Celdrán & Josep Fabà, 2016. "Staff attitudes and reactions towards residents’ masturbation in Spanish long‐term care facilities," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(5-6), pages 819-828, March.
    3. Breschi, M. & Fornasin, A. & Gonano, G. & Mazzoni, S. & Manfredini, M., 2020. "Male fertility between biology and the socioeconomic context news from the past (Alghero, 1866–1935)," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 37(C).
    4. Philip Darbyshire & Drew Dwyer, 2021. "Monetising your mum: The industrification of aged care," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(5-6), pages 16-20, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:72:y:2017:i:3:p:457-467.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.