IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v72y2017i3p441-447..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What’s good for the goose is not good for the gander: Age and gender differences in scanning emotion faces

Author

Listed:
  • Susan Sullivan
  • Anna Campbell
  • Sam B. Hutton
  • Ted Ruffman

Abstract

Objectives:Research indicates that older adults’ (≥60 years) emotion recognition is worse than that of young adults, young and older men’s emotion recognition is worse than that of young and older women (respectively), older adults’ looking at mouths compared with eyes is greater than that of young adults. Nevertheless, previous research has not compared older men’s and women’s looking at emotion faces so the present study had two aims: (a) to examine whether the tendency to look at mouths is stronger amongst older men compared with older women and (b) to examine whether men’s mouth looking correlates with better emotion recognition.Method:We examined the emotion recognition abilities and spontaneous gaze patterns of young (n = 60) and older (n = 58) males and females as they labelled emotion faces.Results:Older men spontaneously looked more to mouths than older women, and older men’s looking at mouths correlated with their emotion recognition, whereas women’s looking at eyes correlated with their emotion recognition.Discussion:The findings are discussed in relation to a growing body of research suggesting both age and gender differences in response to emotional stimuli and the differential efficacy of mouth and eyes looking for men and women.

Suggested Citation

  • Susan Sullivan & Anna Campbell & Sam B. Hutton & Ted Ruffman, 2017. "What’s good for the goose is not good for the gander: Age and gender differences in scanning emotion faces," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 72(3), pages 441-447.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:72:y:2017:i:3:p:441-447.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbv033
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:72:y:2017:i:3:p:441-447.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.