IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v69y2014i5p784-797..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Black–White Disparity in Disability Among U.S. Older Adults: Age, Period, and Cohort Trends

Author

Listed:
  • Shih-Fan Lin
  • Audrey N. Beck
  • Brian K. Finch

Abstract

Objectives. This study delineates activities of daily living (ADL) and instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) black–white disparity trends by age, period, and cohort (APC) and explores sociodemographic contributors of cohort-based disparity trends.

Suggested Citation

  • Shih-Fan Lin & Audrey N. Beck & Brian K. Finch, 2014. "Black–White Disparity in Disability Among U.S. Older Adults: Age, Period, and Cohort Trends," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 69(5), pages 784-797.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:69:y:2014:i:5:p:784-797.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbu010
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Faraz Vahid Shahidi & Carles Muntaner & Ketan Shankardass & Carlos Quiñonez & Arjumand Siddiqi, 2018. "Widening health inequalities between the employed and the unemployed: A decomposition of trends in Canada (2000-2014)," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(11), pages 1-22, November.
    2. Xiaoqian Hu & Shuyan Gu & Xuemei Zhen & Xueshan Sun & Yuxuan Gu & Hengjin Dong, 2022. "Trends in activities of daily living disability among Chinese older adults from 1998 to 2018: an age-period-cohort analysis," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 19(4), pages 1167-1179, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:69:y:2014:i:5:p:784-797.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.