IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v68y2013i3p420-430.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sources of Older Parents’ Ambivalent Feelings Toward Their Adult Children: The Case of Rural China

Author

Listed:
  • Man Guo
  • Iris Chi
  • Merril Silverstein

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Man Guo & Iris Chi & Merril Silverstein, 2013. "Sources of Older Parents’ Ambivalent Feelings Toward Their Adult Children: The Case of Rural China," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 68(3), pages 420-430.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:68:y:2013:i:3:p:420-430
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbt022
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zheng Wu & Margaret J. Penning, 2019. "Children and the Mental Health of Older Adults in China: What Matters?," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 38(1), pages 27-52, February.
    2. K. Chen & V. W. Q. Lou & C. Y. M. Cheng & T. Y. S. Lum & J. Y. M. Tang, 2022. "Family Caregiver’s Positive, Negative, and Ambivalent Feelings Towards Stroke Survivors: Association with Psychological Well-Being," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 17(1), pages 169-183, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:68:y:2013:i:3:p:420-430. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.