IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v65by2009i1p22-31.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Tackling Vision-Related Disability in Old Age: An Application of the Life-Span Theory of Control to Narrative Data

Author

Listed:
  • Kathrin Boerner
  • Mark Brennan
  • Amy Horowitz
  • Joann P. Reinhardt

Abstract

This study used the life-span theory of control (Heckhausen, J., & Schulz, R.) to examine adaptation to disability in old age. A narrative approach to data collection was used to assess the strategies employed by 364 older adults with macular degeneration to deal with daily challenges. Findings revealed a rich array of strategies. Compensatory Primary Control was reported by nearly all respondents, Compensatory Secondary Control by a majority, and Selective Primary Control by half of the participants. Selective Secondary Control was the least reported. Differences in strategy use depending on level of vision impairment were the most pronounced within the category of Compensatory Primary Control for strategies that involved using help from others and alternative means. Within the category of Selective Secondary Control, effort to maintain a positive outlook was associated with higher impairment levels, whereas within the category of Compensatory Secondary Control, attempts not to dwell on problems related to vision were associated with lower impairment levels. Implications for conceptual development and future research are discussed. Copyright 2009, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Kathrin Boerner & Mark Brennan & Amy Horowitz & Joann P. Reinhardt, 2009. "Tackling Vision-Related Disability in Old Age: An Application of the Life-Span Theory of Control to Narrative Data," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 65(1), pages 22-31.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:65b:y:2009:i:1:p:22-31
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbp098
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:65b:y:2009:i:1:p:22-31. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.