IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v64by2009i6p733-741.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rapid Emotion Regulation After Mood Induction: Age and Individual Differences

Author

Listed:
  • Mary Jo Larcom
  • Derek M. Isaacowitz

Abstract

Previous research has suggested that emotion regulation improves with age. This study examined both age and individual differences in online emotion regulation after a negative mood induction. We found evidence that older adults were more likely to rapidly regulate their emotions than were younger adults. Moreover, older adults who rapidly regulated had lower trait anxiety and depressive symptoms and higher levels of optimism than their same-age peers who did not rapidly regulate. Measuring mood change over an extended time revealed that older rapid regulators still reported increased levels of positive affect over 20 min later, whereas young adult rapid regulators' moods had declined. These results highlight the importance of considering individual differences when examining age differences in online emotion regulation. Copyright 2009, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Mary Jo Larcom & Derek M. Isaacowitz, 2009. "Rapid Emotion Regulation After Mood Induction: Age and Individual Differences," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 64(6), pages 733-741.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:64b:y:2009:i:6:p:733-741
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbp077
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Molly A. Mather & Rebecca E. Ready, 2021. "Greater negative affect and mixed emotions during spontaneous reactions to sad films in older than younger adults," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 29-43, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:64b:y:2009:i:6:p:733-741. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.