IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v64by2009i4p482-486.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Task Demands Moderate Stereotype Threat Effects on Memory Performance

Author

Listed:
  • Thomas M. Hess
  • Lisa Emery
  • Tara L. Queen

Abstract

Previous research has demonstrated that older adults' memory performance is adversely affected by the explicit activation of negative stereotypes about aging. In this study, we examined the impact of stereotype threat on recognition memory, with specific interest in (a) the generalizability of previously observed effects, (b) the subjective experience of memory, and (c) the moderating effects of task demands. Older participants subjected to threat performed worse than did those in a nonthreat condition but only when performance constraints were high (i.e., memory decisions had to be made within a limited time frame). This effect was reflected in the subjective experience of memory, with participants in this condition having a lower ratio of "remember" to "know" responses. The absence of threat effects when constraints were minimal provides important boundary information regarding stereotype influences on memory performance. Copyright 2009, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Thomas M. Hess & Lisa Emery & Tara L. Queen, 2009. "Task Demands Moderate Stereotype Threat Effects on Memory Performance," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 64(4), pages 482-486.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:64b:y:2009:i:4:p:482-486
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbp044
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:64b:y:2009:i:4:p:482-486. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.