IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v64by2009i4p447-456.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Aging and Selective Engagement: The Moderating Impact of Motivation on Older Adults' Resource Utilization

Author

Listed:
  • Thomas M. Hess
  • Cassandra M. Germain
  • Elizabeth L. Swaim
  • Nicole L. Osowski

Abstract

Two studies were conducted to examine age differences in the impact of motivation in a social cognitive task. We tested the hypothesis that aging is associated with an increase in the selective engagement of cognitive resources in support of performance. Different-aged adults read descriptions of 2 people in order to determine which was better suited for a particular job. These descriptions contained behaviors that were either consistent or inconsistent with the job, and participants performed the task under conditions of high versus low accountability. Examination of memory for behavioral information revealed that accountability disproportionately affected older adults' performance, with the locus of this effect being in conscious recollection processes. This supports the aforementioned selective engagement hypothesis by demonstrating that the differential impact of the motivational manipulation was based in deliberative memory processes. Copyright 2009, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Thomas M. Hess & Cassandra M. Germain & Elizabeth L. Swaim & Nicole L. Osowski, 2009. "Aging and Selective Engagement: The Moderating Impact of Motivation on Older Adults' Resource Utilization," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 64(4), pages 447-456.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:64b:y:2009:i:4:p:447-456
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbp020
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:64b:y:2009:i:4:p:447-456. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.