IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v64by2009i1p33-40.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing Outcome Expectations in Older Adults: The Multidimensional Outcome Expectations for Exercise Scale

Author

Listed:
  • Thomas R. Wójcicki
  • Siobhan M. White
  • Edward McAuley

Abstract

Outcome expectations, an important element of social cognitive theory, have been associated with physical activity in older adults. Yet, the measurement of this construct has often adopted a unidimensional approach. We examined the validity of a theoretically consistent three-factor (physical, social, and self-evaluative) outcome expectations exercise scale in middle-aged and older adults (N = 320; M age = 63.8). Participants completed questionnaires assessing outcome expectations, physical activity, self-efficacy, and health status. Comparisons of the hypothesized factor structure with competing models indicated that a three-factor model provided the best fit for the data. Construct validity was further demonstrated by significant association with physical activity and self-efficacy and differential associations with age and health status. Further evidence of validity and application to social cognitive models of physical activity is warranted. Copyright 2009, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Thomas R. Wójcicki & Siobhan M. White & Edward McAuley, 2009. "Assessing Outcome Expectations in Older Adults: The Multidimensional Outcome Expectations for Exercise Scale," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 64(1), pages 33-40.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:64b:y:2009:i:1:p:33-40
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbn032
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Frances Horgan & Vanda Cummins & Dawn A. Skelton & Frank Doyle & Maria O’Sullivan & Rose Galvin & Elissa Burton & Jan Sorensen & Samira Barbara Jabakhanji & Bex Townley & Debbie Rooney & Gill Jackson , 2022. "Enhancing Existing Formal Home Care to Improve and Maintain Functional Status in Older Adults: Results of a Feasibility Study on the Implementation of Care to Move (CTM) in an Irish Healthcare Setting," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-18, September.
    2. Justine E. Leavy & Adrian E. Bauman & Michael Rosenberg & Fiona C. Bull, 2014. "Examining the Communication Effects of Health Campaigns," SAGE Open, , vol. 4(2), pages 21582440145, May.
    3. Dixon-Ibarra, Alicia & Nery-Hurwit, Mara & Driver, Simon & MacDonald, Megan, 2017. "Using health promotion guidelines for persons with disabilities to develop and evaluate a physical activity program for individuals with multiple sclerosis: A feasibility study," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 150-159.
    4. Eunhye Kim & Semi Han, 2021. "Determinants of Continuance Intention to Use Health Apps among Users over 60: A Test of Social Cognitive Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-19, October.
    5. Amanda H. Wilkerson & Nuha Abutalib & Ny’Nika T. McFadden & Shristi Bhochhibhoya & Adriana Dragicevic & Bushra R. Salous & Vinayak K. Nahar, 2023. "A Social Cognitive Assessment of Workplace Sedentary Behavior among a Sample of University Employees," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(15), pages 1-12, July.
    6. Whitney N. Neal & Dorothy Pekmezi & Robert W. Motl, 2024. "Physical Activity Levels and Social Cognitive Theory Correlates among Adults with Crohn’s Disease: Preliminary Results from a Cross-Sectional Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(4), pages 1-11, April.
    7. Han Lv & Xueyan Cao & Shiqi Chen & Liqun Liu, 2022. "Public and Private Information Sharing under “New Normal” of COVID-19: Understanding the Roles of Habit and Outcome Expectation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-26, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:64b:y:2009:i:1:p:33-40. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.