IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/ereveh/v17y2013i3p251-271.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

One world of labour regulation, two worlds of trade: examples of Belgium and Brazil

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Huberman

Abstract

Supposedly, labour regulation makes firms less competitive in international markets. This paper studies the adoption of labour laws in Belgium before 1914 and Brazil in the 1920s. In the two countries, regulation induced investments in new plant and equipment. The rise in labour productivity made Belgian firms better exporters in the context of expanding world trade. Brazil did not reap similar gains because international trade was collapsing. Copyright , Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Huberman, 2013. "One world of labour regulation, two worlds of trade: examples of Belgium and Brazil," European Review of Economic History, European Historical Economics Society, vol. 17(3), pages 251-271, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:ereveh:v:17:y:2013:i:3:p:251-271
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/ereh/hes021
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marc Badia†Miró & Anna Carreras†Marín & Christopher M. Meissner, 2018. "Geography, policy, or productivity? Regional trade in five South American countries, 1910–50," Economic History Review, Economic History Society, vol. 71(1), pages 236-266, February.
    2. Marc Badia-Miró & Anna Carreras-Marín & Christopher M. Meissner, 2014. "Geography, Policy, or Productivity? Regional Trade in five South American Countries, 1910-1950," NBER Working Papers 20790, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:ereveh:v:17:y:2013:i:3:p:251-271. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/ereh .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.