IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/erevae/v8y1981i1p41-55..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Direct income transfers for the agricultural sector in less-favoured areas (DIT-LFA)The Council directive no. 268/75 EEC, title II: A comparison between and within Member Countries

Author

Listed:
  • W. PETERS
  • U. LANGENDORF

Abstract

Summary The subject of our article, DIT, is the special type of direct income transfer applied by the EC in order to improve the income situation of farm holdings in less-favoured areas (LFA) of the Community. (DIT) is intended as a safeguard for agricultural activities, a means of maintaining a minimum density of population, and a way of conserving and managing the landscape in these areas. The considerable regional variation in the size of the subsidy per farm, together with considerations regarding the conception of this measure, bring the distributive effects of DIT-LFA to the fore. If regional conditions are compared with the distribution of subsidies, it becomes obvious that the payments are not centred on farm holdings and regions of low income. In fact, the contribution made by DIT is, at best, of only marginal importance in reducing emigration from less-favoured areas, and although income transfers in the form of DIT-LFA are definitely connected with agricultural land-use, they do not necessarily facilitate the conservation and management of the landscape. If DIT-LFA are intended as a means of improving the incomes of low-income farm holdings, then we regard it as imperative that the entire concept of this measure be reconsidered.

Suggested Citation

  • W. Peters & U. Langendorf, 1981. "Direct income transfers for the agricultural sector in less-favoured areas (DIT-LFA)The Council directive no. 268/75 EEC, title II: A comparison between and within Member Countries," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 8(1), pages 41-55.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:erevae:v:8:y:1981:i:1:p:41-55.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/erae/8.1.41
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:erevae:v:8:y:1981:i:1:p:41-55.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eaaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.