IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/erevae/v5y1978i3-4p201-219..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Agricultural trade relations between the EC and temperate food exporting countries

Author

Listed:
  • STEFAN TANGERMANN

Abstract

After a short account of the development of EC negotiating positions in international talks on agricultural trade till September 1978, the economics of agricultural protection and some basic problems in EC agricultural trade are discussed. It is argued that the nature of the CAP-instruments as well as the way in which they have been used is overprotectionist. The fundamental problem of the CAP is that it is a policy on a community level without a real supranational character. Single member countries' interests play a more important role in the CAP than the overall outcome. Although the Community has always argued that world market stability is important per se and a necessary prerequisite of liberalizing agricultural trade, its own contribution to it has so far been rather negative. Some adjustments of the CAP are proposed in order to absorb more instability at home and to increase agricultural imports into Europe, like making the import levies less variable, widening the band between threshold and intervention prices and, in particular, restricting or abandoning the use of export subsidies. Although adjustments of this kind are by no means radical, they could do much to limit confrontation and enhance cooperation in international trade. Increasing agricultural imports into Europe, moreover, may be a prerequisite of expanding markets for EC industrial exports.

Suggested Citation

  • Stefan Tangermann, 1978. "Agricultural trade relations between the EC and temperate food exporting countries," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 5(3-4), pages 201-219.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:erevae:v:5:y:1978:i:3-4:p:201-219.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/erae/5.3-4.201-a
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:erevae:v:5:y:1978:i:3-4:p:201-219.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eaaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.