IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/erevae/v51y2024i5p1348-1383..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Leading-by-example and the voluntary provision of public goods in rural areas: Experimental evidence from China

Author

Listed:
  • Ziming Liu
  • Zetian Wang
  • Jing Zhang
  • Shuyi Feng
  • Yuxin Zhu
  • Jens Rommel

Abstract

Comparing randomly selected and real-world political leaders, this paper investigates the effect of leading-by-example on voluntary contributions in a linear contribution mechanism public goods game experiment with 550 residents in rural China. This setting provides a unique social structure, shaping people’s responses to leadership. We find that leading-by-example set by political leaders and randomly selected leaders increases participants’ contribution by 1.432 and 1.162 Chinese Yuan, which is an increase of approximately 22 and 18 per cent of average contributions in the control group. The difference in the effects of leading-by-example set by political leaders and randomly selected leaders is small and statistically insignificant. Contributions under the leading-by-example treatments are driven by increased contributions from leaders and mimicking behaviour of followers, although following political leaders is weaker. Our findings highlight the crucial role of leading-by-example and strong village-level institutions in the provision of public goods.

Suggested Citation

  • Ziming Liu & Zetian Wang & Jing Zhang & Shuyi Feng & Yuxin Zhu & Jens Rommel, 2024. "Leading-by-example and the voluntary provision of public goods in rural areas: Experimental evidence from China," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 51(5), pages 1348-1383.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:erevae:v:51:y:2024:i:5:p:1348-1383.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/erae/jbae036
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:erevae:v:51:y:2024:i:5:p:1348-1383.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eaaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.