IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/erevae/v4y1977i1p49-73..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The effectiveness of the London grain futures markets: Some empirical results

Author

Listed:
  • G. L. REES
  • D. W. COLENUTT

Abstract

Summary Hypothetical exercises were carried out for each of (i) conventional hedging, (ii) operational hedging, and (iii) carrying-charge hedging, for two periods, viz, I, harvest 1969 to June 1972, and, II, June 1972 to December 1974. For three-month type (i) hedges in both barley and wheat, losses and gains were on the whole diminished in accordance with theory. Hypothetical hedges of six-month duration reduced price risk during period II. For operational hedging, durations of two and four weeks were chosen. The results were markedly inferior to type (i) hedging, especially for the shorter time period. Carrying-charge hedges were selected in suitable cases, from the data assembled for the type (i) exercise. Results for this third category of hedging, which depends for its effectiveness upon changes in spot and futures prices, were generally satisfactory for hypothetical trades. Finally, the data show that for both wheat and barley, there was a significant decrease in price instability following the opening of the futures markets. However, due to other major changes, it is not possible to claim that this was the result of futures trading.

Suggested Citation

  • G. L. Rees & D. W. Colenutt, 1977. "The effectiveness of the London grain futures markets: Some empirical results," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 4(1), pages 49-73.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:erevae:v:4:y:1977:i:1:p:49-73.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/erae/4.1.49
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:erevae:v:4:y:1977:i:1:p:49-73.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eaaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.