IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/erevae/v44y2017i1p177-181..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Editors’ Report 2015/2016

Author

Listed:
  • Iain Fraser
  • Giannis Karagiannis
  • Steve McCorriston
  • Jack Peerlings
  • Ada Wossink

Abstract

The level of submissions to the ERAE remains very healthy. At the same time the speed of response by the editors is now on average significantly less than three months. With regard to citation impact the ERAE continues to perform well with a score of 1.544 recorded in 2015 and the indication is that 2016 will show further improvement. Finally, the editorial process as well as the relationship with Oxford University Press continues to be very efficient which bodes well for the future of the ERAE.

Suggested Citation

  • Iain Fraser & Giannis Karagiannis & Steve McCorriston & Jack Peerlings & Ada Wossink, 2017. "Editors’ Report 2015/2016," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 44(1), pages 177-181.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:erevae:v:44:y:2017:i:1:p:177-181.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/erae/jbw027
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:erevae:v:44:y:2017:i:1:p:177-181.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eaaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.