IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/erevae/v41y2014i1p87-109.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Willingness to pay for pesticide reduction in the EU: nothing but organic?

Author

Listed:
  • Pascale Bazoche
  • Pierre Combris
  • Eric Giraud-Héraud
  • Alexandra Seabra Pinto
  • Frank Bunte
  • Efthimia Tsakiridou

Abstract

Using experimental auctions carried out on apples in different European countries, this paper contributes to the assessment of consumer willingness to pay for the reduction of pesticides. We study several systems of good agricultural practices, possibly signalled to consumers, ranging from Integrated Pest Management certifications to organic production methods. The results show a relatively homogeneous behaviour of European consumers and reveal that improving the information on pesticide reduction may have unintended consequences. Results also suggest that taste characteristics and reference to a Protected Denomination of Origin should not be overlooked. , Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Pascale Bazoche & Pierre Combris & Eric Giraud-Héraud & Alexandra Seabra Pinto & Frank Bunte & Efthimia Tsakiridou, 2014. "Willingness to pay for pesticide reduction in the EU: nothing but organic?," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 41(1), pages 87-109, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:erevae:v:41:y:2014:i:1:p:87-109
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/erae/jbt011
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or search for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:erevae:v:41:y:2014:i:1:p:87-109. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eaaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.